Structured data
Statements, identifiers, labels and coordinates from Wikidata, which places them in the public domain. Imported statements link to their Wikidata statement. Named passage accounts are separately cited drafts.
Honest about the evidence
How this site reads its sources — written as the mechanism rather than as a policy, because a mechanism can be checked.
The rest of the statements are imports, and the site says so on every row rather than in a paragraph here.
Tracked separately, and credited separately on every page that uses one.
Statements, identifiers, labels and coordinates from Wikidata, which places them in the public domain. Imported statements link to their Wikidata statement. Named passage accounts are separately cited drafts.
The separately labelled excerpt on a profile, and the article read at /wiki/, come from Wikipedia under share-alike terms. The article link is the attribution, because the article’s history is its list of authors. Original introductions are separately labelled AI-assisted drafts with citations and pending human review. Wikipedia text is quoted, never merged into our own prose, and never reconciled across accounts that disagree.
Each file on Wikimedia Commons carries its own licence, named under the picture with its author. A file whose licence cannot be read is dropped, with its subject’s picture: being on Commons is not a licence.
A modern translation or edition is not public domain because the work behind it is ancient. Where this site shows a witness to a text, it names that witness’s own date and its own rights.
Every relationship belongs to a mode, and the mode decides how it may be drawn.
The drawing code is given the mode and never the relationship, so a teacher cannot be rendered as a father by an oversight. Under each group on a profile is what that relationship does not claim — one example of each:
Parentage as a named source tells it. Not an independently established biological relationship, and different accounts disagree.
“parent of” does not imply an independently established biological relationship · agreement between accounts
A documented human family relationship. Not a succession mechanism, and not religious transmission.
“parent of” does not imply a right to an office · transmission of a teaching
Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.
“held the office” does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim
Teaching passed from one person to another. Not biological ancestry and not automatic institutional succession.
“taught” does not imply biological ancestry · institutional succession · agreement between teacher and student
Association with a tradition or school. Traditions branch, overlap and re-merge; this is not a clean single-origin tree.
“belongs to” does not imply personal belief at every point in a life · the practice of a population
One figure treated as another in some context. Not literal identity in all contexts, and usually a claim by a third party.
“identified with” does not imply literal identity in all contexts · that either tradition made the identification
A transmission argued from evidence. Not shared symbols, and not a short path through a database.
“influenced” does not imply shared symbols as evidence · a short path through a database
Two figures share a trait. Not proof of influence and not proof of common origin.
“shares an attribute with” does not imply influence · common origin · that either tradition draws the comparison
A ruler or institution supported something. Not the belief of a population, and not the patron’s own practice in every period.
“was a patron of” does not imply the religion of a population · personal adherence in every period of a life
Where something is, or is documented. A location is not by itself evidence of activity.
“is located in” does not imply that anything is documented to have happened there
A work, its editions and its witnesses are distinct; their dates are not interchangeable.
“appears in” does not imply that the work is the only account · that the work is contemporary with what it describes
A domain, symbol or epithet as sources record it.
“is associated with” does not imply an exclusive domain · the same association in every account
A figure is venerated somewhere or by someone. Not a claim about how many people did, or when they stopped.
“is recognised as” does not imply recognition by any other church or tradition · a judgement about the historicity of the life · the same status in every branch of the church that confers it
Events Wikidata records in a subject’s history, and the day a festival is kept. Not a complete history, and the day a festival falls on is not when it began.
“recorded event” does not imply that these are all the events in its history · that Wikidata ranks the events by importance
A single date field is the most common way a reference work about religion misleads, so there is no single date field.
It happened, or is attested, then. A life, a reign, a building.
A work was composed, copied or printed then. The Theogony’s date is not Aphrodite’s, and a manuscript’s date is a floor on the work rather than a date for it.
Time inside an account. It has no historical counterpart and cannot be compared with one.
A deity’s earliest surviving mention is not its birth. A shrine’s building date is not the beginning of a tradition. A missing end date means unknown far more often than it means ongoing, and the pages say which.
Every shape on the atlas carries a role, and the legend names it.
A blank area on the atlas means no evidence in this collection. It does not mean the absence of belief.
There is no checkmark anywhere on this site. Each claim carries its standing as a word.
Taken from Wikidata as it stands. Nobody here has read it.
The statement cites something outside Wikimedia. That citation has not been checked here.
A person here read it and signed it with a date. This label is unreachable in the code without such a record.
What a tradition teaches, presented as a teaching rather than as a finding.
Sources disagree, and the disagreement is kept.
The source said circa, allegedly or presumably, and this does not turn that into a date.
Worked out from other records here. A chain of records is a fact about this database, not an argument about history.
The import did not say which tradition or source the claim holds for. Most imported kinship rows truthfully say this.
Wikipedia and a Wikidata statement imported from that article are one source, counted once. Where a statement’s only reference is a Wikimedia project, it is not counted as sourced — which is why the number on each profile is lower than the number of references.
No account is needed to read, to save or to keep a history.
You are never asked what you believe. Reading about religion is sensitive, so local saves are separate from optional, consented website analytics.
What you save and your recent trail are stored in this browser’s local storage and are not uploaded by this site. Settings counts what this browser holds and clears it.
Pictures load from Wikimedia Commons, and the article reader fetches from Wikipedia. Wider Wikipedia search runs only when you ask. The live Wikidata view requests a complete source item only after you press Load full record; linked names may require a few further requests. Wikimedia’s servers can see the requested files, articles, search words and item IDs. These requests do not carry your local shelf or recent trail. Successfully loaded live records stay in the page’s memory for five minutes.
Each page loads HistorIQly’s account script to check this browser’s signed-in plan. It also supports optional analytics and a chat widget. Analytics requires consent, which may have been given on another HistorIQly site, and can record page paths (including subject names) with a session identifier. It excludes queries, fragments and local shelf/trail records. The companion receives public page context when enabled and messages you choose to send. It is disabled on Library, Settings and live Wikidata inspection. Review or change analytics consent.
Discovered from Wikidata, harvested once and committed — so a published page cannot change under a reader.
Records are discovered from Wikidata by class and by religion — deities through the subclass tree, places and figures through a search index ranked by incoming links — then filtered against each item’s own statements. The harvest runs on a developer’s machine and its output is committed, so a deploy never talks to Wikidata and a published page cannot change under a reader.
Counts of records, citations, places and undated entries for every collection, with the gaps an editor wrote down.