Skip to content

House

Princes of Condé

French princely house and a cadet branch of the House of Bourbon

  • Dated 1557 CE – 1830 CE
  • Also called House of Bourbon-Condé, House of Condé, Princes of Conde
The members Compare

A family
on the record,
reign by reign.

Documented kin

Arms of Henri de Conde
Carlodangio  · CC BY-SA 4.0

Overview

Read the full article On Wikipedia ↗
In 11 other languages

de · es · fr · it · ja · ko · nl · pl · pt · ru · zh

From Wikipedia, quoted unmodified under CC BY-SA 4.0; the article’s history is its list of authors.

Members · 7

The house, member by member

One family drawn as a tree, then every member, oldest first where a date is recorded.

What this means

People whose own records place them in this house. Membership of a house is a family fact. It is not a religious affiliation and not a right to any office. “Child of” appears where a member’s recorded parent is also in the house — a documented human family, the same kind of claim as membership, and nothing more. Imported from Wikidata: nothing here has been read by an editor.

Louis, Prince of Condé 1668 CE – 1710 CE

6 children in the house

  1. Marie Gabrielle Éléonore de Bourbon 1690 CE – 1760 CE
  2. Louis Henri, Duke of Bourbon 1692 CE – 1740 CE
  3. Louise Anne de Bourbon 1695 CE – 1758 CE
  4. Marie Anne de Bourbon 1697 CE – 1741 CE
  5. Henriette Louise de Bourbon 1703 CE – 1772 CE
  6. Louis de Bourbon, Count of Clermont 1709 CE – 1771 CE
One family in Princes of Condé: members whose records name this parent, oldest first. A parent from another house is on the child’s own page. Open the family tree

Every member

People whose own records place them in this house.

Succession

Offices held in the house

The members in each office, in order — a selection from the office’s whole line.

  • 2 holders
  • 1 undated
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

  1. 1733 CE – 1772 CE Henriette Louise de Bourbon French abbess (1703-1772)

No dates recorded 1

Every recorded holder

Chronology is not a full explanation

Why one member followed another takes evidence beyond the order of their dates. That both belonged to the house is not, on its own, that evidence.

Religious context · a separate claim

Affiliation

Counted from the members’ own statements — never the religion of anyone the house ruled.

What this means

Assembled from the members’ own statements, and counted. What a person was affiliated with, what a ruler paid for, what a state did and what a population practised are four separate kinds of claim. Only the first two are in the data at all, and they are kept apart here.

Affiliations recorded on members

An affiliation recorded by a third party, often for one period of a life. It is not the religion of anyone this house ruled.

Connections

How Princes of Condé connects

Grouped by the kind of relationship, because a successor is not a son and a shared symbol is not an influence.

Affiliation 1

What this means

Association with a tradition or school. Traditions branch, overlap and re-merge; this is not a clean single-origin tree.

Does not imply a fixed roster · that every account of the tradition knows this figure

Imported from Wikidata unless a tile says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

Transmission 1

What this means

Teaching passed from one person to another. Not biological ancestry and not automatic institutional succession.

Does not imply that the tradition began fully formed · that later adherents accept the attribution

Imported from Wikidata unless a tile says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

Sources

Sources and evidence

Where every statement on this page comes from, and how each one stands.

How this site reads its sources

2 statements on this record

  • 2 Imported Taken from Wikidata as it stands. Nobody here has read it. 2 of them cite only Wikipedia: one source, counted once.

Only this record’s own statements. What other records say about it is counted on theirs.

Three layers, three licences

Data
Wikidata · CC0 1.0
Text
Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted, not merged
Pictures
Wikimedia Commons · each file’s own terms

Review

Not yet read by an editor here. Every relationship on this page is an import.

Disagreements are kept, not resolved, and a count of sources is not a confidence score.

Junta Granada Informa from Granada, España · CC BY-SA 2.0

Keep exploring

More houses, tradition by tradition

The directory lists every one on record, most widely recorded first.

All houses Compare

A family on the record
is not a family in a myth.