Skip to content

House

Přemyslid dynasty

Dynasty

  • Dated 872 CE – 1521 CE
  • Also called Přemyslids

A family
on the record,
reign by reign.

Documented kin

Přemyslovci erb
Erb_Přemyslovců.png : copy of Daniel Zeman 's upload derivative work: Petr Wudi (talk)  · Public domain

Overview

From Wikipedia, quoted unmodified under CC BY-SA 4.0; the article’s history is its list of authors.

Members · 33

The house, member by member

One family drawn as a tree, then every member, oldest first where a date is recorded.

What this means

People whose own records place them in this house. Membership of a house is a family fact. It is not a religious affiliation and not a right to any office. “Child of” appears where a member’s recorded parent is also in the house — a documented human family, the same kind of claim as membership, and nothing more. Imported from Wikidata: nothing here has been read by an editor.

4 children in the house

  1. Frederick, Duke of Bohemia 1142 CE – 1189 CE
  2. Adalbert III of Bohemia 1145 CE – 1200 CE
  3. Vladislaus III, Duke of Bohemia 1160 CE – 1222 CE
  4. Ottokar I of Bohemia 1167 CE – 1230 CE 4 children in the house
One family in Přemyslid dynasty: members whose records name this parent, oldest first. A parent from another house is on the child’s own page. Open the family tree

Every member

People whose own records place them in this house.

Show 15 more

Succession

Offices held in the house

The members in each office, in order — a selection from the office’s whole line.

Duke of Bohemia

  • 17 holders
  • 9 gaps
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

  1. 1st 872 CE – 883 CE Bořivoj I Duke of Bohemia (9th century)
  2. Gap about 2 years before the next in this house

    1st 885 CE – 888 CE Bořivoj I Duke of Bohemia (9th century)
  3. 3rd 888 CE – 915 CE Spytihněv I, Duke of Bohemia Duke of Bohemia
  4. 4th 915 CE – 13 February 921 CE Vratislaus I, Duke of Bohemia Duke of Bohemia
  5. 5th 13 February 921 CE – 28 September 935 CE Saint Wenceslaus I, Duke of Bohemia duke and saint
  6. 6th 28 September 935 CE – 15 July 972 CE Boleslaus I, Duke of Bohemia Duke of Bohemia from 935 to 972
  7. 7th 15 July 972 CE – 7 February 999 CE Boleslaus II, Duke of Bohemia Duke of Bohemia from 972 to 999
  8. Gap about 101 years before the next in this house

    17th 1100 CE – 1107 CE Bořivoj II, Duke of Bohemia Duke of Bohemia
  9. Gap about 2 years before the next in this house

    17th December 1109 CE – 1110 CE Bořivoj II, Duke of Bohemia Duke of Bohemia
  10. Gap about 7 years before the next in this house

    17th 1117 CE – 1120 CE Bořivoj II, Duke of Bohemia Duke of Bohemia
  11. Gap about 20 years before the next in this house

    21st 1140 CE – 1158 CE Vladislaus II of Bohemia Duke and King of Bohemia (1110–1172)
  12. Gap about 14 years before the next in this house

    22nd 1172 CE – 1173 CE Frederick, Duke of Bohemia Duke of Bohemia (c. 1142 – 1189)
  13. Gap about 5 years before the next in this house

    22nd 1178 CE – July 1182 CE Frederick, Duke of Bohemia Duke of Bohemia (c. 1142 – 1189)
  14. 22nd September 1182 CE – 1189 CE Frederick, Duke of Bohemia Duke of Bohemia (c. 1142 – 1189)
  15. Gap about 3 years before the next in this house

    26th 1192 CE – 1193 CE Ottokar I of Bohemia duke and king of Bohemia
  16. Gap about 4 years before the next in this house

    26th December 1197 CE – 1198 CE Ottokar I of Bohemia duke and king of Bohemia
Show 1 more holder
  1. 28th June 1197 CE – December 1197 CE Vladislaus III, Duke of Bohemia Duke of Bohemia (c. 1160 – 1222)

King of Bohemia

  • 6 holders
  • 1 gap
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

  1. 2nd 1158 CE – 1172 CE Vladislaus II of Bohemia Duke and King of Bohemia (1110–1172)
  2. Gap about 26 years before the next in this house

    3rd 1198 CE – 1230 CE Ottokar I of Bohemia duke and king of Bohemia
  3. 4th 1230 CE – 1253 CE Wenceslaus I of Bohemia King of Bohemia from 1230 to 1253
  4. 5th 1253 CE – 1278 CE Ottokar II of Bohemia King of Bohemia (1253-1278)
  5. 6th 1278 CE – 1305 CE Wenceslaus II of Bohemia King of Bohemia and Poland
  6. 7th 1305 CE – 1306 CE Wenceslaus III of Bohemia King of Hungary, Bohemia and Poland

King of Poland

  • 4 holders
  • 2 undated
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

  1. August 1300 CE – 21 June 1305 CE Wenceslaus II of Bohemia King of Bohemia and Poland
  2. 1305 CE – 4 August 1306 CE Wenceslaus III of Bohemia King of Hungary, Bohemia and Poland

No dates recorded 2

Prince-Elector

  • 3 holders
  • 3 undated
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

No dates recorded 3

Chronology is not a full explanation

Why one member followed another takes evidence beyond the order of their dates. That both belonged to the house is not, on its own, that evidence.

Religious context · a separate claim

Affiliation

Counted from the members’ own statements — never the religion of anyone the house ruled.

What this means

Assembled from the members’ own statements, and counted. What a person was affiliated with, what a ruler paid for, what a state did and what a population practised are four separate kinds of claim. Only the first two are in the data at all, and they are kept apart here.

Affiliations recorded on members

An affiliation recorded by a third party, often for one period of a life. It is not the religion of anyone this house ruled.

Connections

How Přemyslid dynasty connects

Grouped by the kind of relationship, because a successor is not a son and a shared symbol is not an influence.

Transmission 2

What this means

Teaching passed from one person to another. Not biological ancestry and not automatic institutional succession.

Does not imply that the tradition began fully formed · that later adherents accept the attribution

Imported from Wikidata unless a tile says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

Sources

Sources and evidence

Where every statement on this page comes from, and how each one stands.

1 statement on this record

  • 1 Imported Taken from Wikidata as it stands. Nobody here has read it. 1 of it cites only Wikipedia: one source, counted once.

Only this record’s own statements. What other records say about it is counted on theirs.

Three layers, three licences

Data
Wikidata · CC0 1.0
Text
Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted, not merged
Pictures
Wikimedia Commons · each file’s own terms

Review

Not yet read by an editor here. Every relationship on this page is an import.

Disagreements are kept, not resolved, and a count of sources is not a confidence score.

Junta Granada Informa from Granada, España · CC BY-SA 2.0

Keep exploring

More houses, tradition by tradition

The directory lists every one on record, most widely recorded first.

A family on the record
is not a family in a myth.