Skip to content

House

Jiménez dynasty

Noble family

  • Dated from 8th century CE
  • Also called Jimenez dynasty

A family
on the record,
reign by reign.

Documented kin

Armas de la Dinastia Jimena de Navarra
CC BY-SA 4.0 lead image of the English Wikipedia article

Overview

From Wikipedia, quoted unmodified under CC BY-SA 4.0; the article’s history is its list of authors.

Members · 18

The house, member by member

One family drawn as a tree, then every member, oldest first where a date is recorded.

What this means

People whose own records place them in this house. Membership of a house is a family fact. It is not a religious affiliation and not a right to any office. “Child of” appears where a member’s recorded parent is also in the house — a documented human family, the same kind of claim as membership, and nothing more. Imported from Wikidata: nothing here has been read by an editor.

5 children in the house

  1. Urraca of Zamora 1033 CE – 1101 CE
  2. Sancho II of León and Castile c. 1036 CE – 1072 CE
  3. Elvira of Toro 1038 CE – 1099 CE
  4. Alfonso VI of León and Castile 1040 CE – 1109 CE 1 child in the house
  5. García II of Galicia c. 1042 CE – 1090 CE
One family in Jiménez dynasty: members whose records name this parent, oldest first. A parent from another house is on the child’s own page. Open the family tree

Every member

People whose own records place them in this house.

Succession

Offices held in the house

The members in each office, in order — a selection from the office’s whole line.

King of Pamplona

  • 8 holders
  • 2 gaps
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

  1. 816 CE – 852 CE Inigo Arista king of Pamplona
  2. Gap about 53 years before the next in this house

    905 CE – 925 CE Sancho I of Pamplona King of Pamplona from 905 to 925
  3. Gap about 75 years before the next in this house

    1000 CE – 1035 CE Sancho III of Navarre King of Pamplona and ruler of Aragon from 1004 to 1035
  4. 1035 CE – 1054 CE García Sánchez III of Pamplona King of Pamplona from 1034 to 1054
  5. 1054 CE – 1076 CE Sancho IV of Navarre King of Pamplona
  6. 1076 CE – 1094 CE Sancho Ramírez King of Aragon and Pamplone
  7. 1094 CE – 1104 CE Peter I of Aragon and Pamplona King of Aragon and Pamplona
  8. 1104 CE – 1134 CE Alphonse the Battler King of Aragon and Pamplona (1073-1134)

Count of Ribagorza

  • 6 holders
  • 1 gap
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

  1. 1018 CE – 1035 CE Sancho III of Navarre King of Pamplona and ruler of Aragon from 1004 to 1035
  2. Gap about 8 years before the next in this house

    1043 CE – 1063 CE Ramiro I of Aragon Aragonese king
  3. 1063 CE – 1085 CE Sancho Ramírez King of Aragon and Pamplone
  4. 1085 CE – 1104 CE Peter I of Aragon and Pamplona King of Aragon and Pamplona
  5. 1104 CE – 1134 CE Alphonse the Battler King of Aragon and Pamplona (1073-1134)
  6. 29 September 1134 CE – 1157 CE Ramiro II of Aragon King of Aragon and monk

Monarch of the kingdom of Aragon

  • 5 holders
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

  1. 18 October 1035 CE – 8 May 1063 CE Ramiro I of Aragon Aragonese king Has references
  2. 1063 CE – 1094 CE Sancho Ramírez King of Aragon and Pamplone
  3. 1094 CE – 1104 CE Peter I of Aragon and Pamplona King of Aragon and Pamplona Recognised by Kingdom of Aragon
  4. 1104 CE – 1134 CE Alphonse the Battler King of Aragon and Pamplona (1073-1134) Recognised by Kingdom of Aragon
  5. 29 September 1134 CE – 13 November 1137 CE Ramiro II of Aragon King of Aragon and monk Recognised by Kingdom of Aragon

Monarch of Galicia

  • 6 holders
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

  1. 1065 CE – 1071 CE García II of Galicia King of Galicia
  2. 1071 CE – 1072 CE Alfonso VI of León and Castile King of León (1065 to 1109), of Castile (1072 to 1109), and of Galicia (1071 to 1109)
  3. 1072 CE – 7 October 1072 CE Sancho II of León and Castile King of Leon and Castile
  4. 1072 CE – 1073 CE García II of Galicia King of Galicia
  5. 1073 CE – 1 July 1109 CE Alfonso VI of León and Castile King of León (1065 to 1109), of Castile (1072 to 1109), and of Galicia (1071 to 1109)
  6. 1109 CE – 8 March 1126 CE Urraca of León Spanish queen

Chronology is not a full explanation

Why one member followed another takes evidence beyond the order of their dates. That both belonged to the house is not, on its own, that evidence.

Religious context · a separate claim

Affiliation

Counted from the members’ own statements — never the religion of anyone the house ruled.

What this means

Assembled from the members’ own statements, and counted. What a person was affiliated with, what a ruler paid for, what a state did and what a population practised are four separate kinds of claim. Only the first two are in the data at all, and they are kept apart here.

Affiliations recorded on members

An affiliation recorded by a third party, often for one period of a life. It is not the religion of anyone this house ruled.

Sources

Sources and evidence

Where every statement on this page comes from, and how each one stands.

0 statements on this record

This record makes no statements of its own yet, so there is nothing here to weigh.

Only this record’s own statements. What other records say about it is counted on theirs.

Three layers, three licences

Data
Wikidata · CC0 1.0
Text
Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted, not merged
Pictures
Wikimedia Commons · each file’s own terms lead image of the English Wikipedia article

Review

Not yet read by an editor here. Every relationship on this page is an import.

Disagreements are kept, not resolved, and a count of sources is not a confidence score.

Junta Granada Informa from Granada, España · CC BY-SA 2.0

Keep exploring

More houses, tradition by tradition

The directory lists every one on record, most widely recorded first.

A family on the record
is not a family in a myth.