Skip to content

House

House of Plantagenet

English royal dynasty in medieval England

  • Dated 1126 CE – 1485 CE
  • Also called Plantagenet dynasty, Angevin dynasty, Plantagenets

A family
on the record,
reign by reign.

Documented kin

Blason maison Plantagenêt
CC BY-SA 4.0

Overview

From Wikipedia, quoted unmodified under CC BY-SA 4.0; the article’s history is its list of authors.

Members · 23

The house, member by member

One family drawn as a tree, then every member, oldest first where a date is recorded.

What this means

People whose own records place them in this house. Membership of a house is a family fact. It is not a religious affiliation and not a right to any office. “Child of” appears where a member’s recorded parent is also in the house — a documented human family, the same kind of claim as membership, and nothing more. Imported from Wikidata: nothing here has been read by an editor.

9 children in the house

  1. Eleanor of England, Countess of Bar 1269 CE – 1297 CE
  2. Joan of Acre 1272 CE – 1307 CE
  3. Alphonso, Earl of Chester 1273 CE – 1284 CE
  4. Margaret of England 1275 CE – 1333 CE
  5. Mary of Woodstock 1278 CE – c. 1332 CE
  6. Elizabeth of Rhuddlan 1282 CE – 1316 CE
  7. Edward II of England 1284 CE – 1327 CE
  8. Thomas of Brotherton, 1st Earl of Norfolk 1300 CE – 1338 CE 1 child in the house
  9. Edmund of Woodstock, 1st Earl of Kent 1301 CE – 1330 CE
One family in House of Plantagenet: members whose records name this parent, oldest first. A parent from another house is on the child’s own page. Open the family tree

Every member

People whose own records place them in this house.

Show 5 more

Succession

Offices held in the house

The members in each office, in order — a selection from the office’s whole line.

Monarch of England

  • 6 holders
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

  1. 19 December 1154 CE – 6 July 1189 CE Henry II of England King of England from 1154 to 1189
  2. 3 September 1189 CE – 6 April 1199 CE Richard I of England King of England from 1189 to 1199 (1157–1199)
  3. 6 April 1199 CE – 19 October 1216 CE John, King of England King of England from 1199 to 1216
  4. 28 October 1216 CE – 16 November 1272 CE Henry III of England King of England from 1216 to 1272 Has references
  5. 16 November 1272 CE – 7 July 1307 CE Edward I of England King of England from 1272 to 1307
  6. 7 July 1307 CE – 25 January 1327 CE Edward II of England King of England from 1307 to 1327 Has references

Duke of Normandy

  • 5 holders
  • 1 overlap
  • 3 undated
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

  1. until December 1259 CE Henry III of England King of England from 1216 to 1272 Has references
  2. Overlap held at the same time as Henry III of England

    3 September 1189 CE – 6 April 1199 CE Richard I of England King of England from 1189 to 1199 (1157–1199)

No dates recorded 3

Lord of Ireland

  • 5 holders
  • 1 gap
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

  1. 1171 CE – 6 July 1189 CE Henry II of England King of England from 1154 to 1189
  2. Gap about 10 years before the next in this house

    6 April 1199 CE – 19 October 1216 CE John, King of England King of England from 1199 to 1216
  3. 28 October 1216 CE – 16 November 1272 CE Henry III of England King of England from 1216 to 1272
  4. 16 November 1272 CE – 7 July 1307 CE Edward I of England King of England from 1272 to 1307
  5. 7 July 1307 CE – 25 January 1327 CE Edward II of England King of England from 1307 to 1327

Count of Anjou

  • 4 holders
  • 4 undated
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

No dates recorded 4

Chronology is not a full explanation

Why one member followed another takes evidence beyond the order of their dates. That both belonged to the house is not, on its own, that evidence.

Religious context · a separate claim

Affiliation

Counted from the members’ own statements — never the religion of anyone the house ruled.

What this means

Assembled from the members’ own statements, and counted. What a person was affiliated with, what a ruler paid for, what a state did and what a population practised are four separate kinds of claim. Only the first two are in the data at all, and they are kept apart here.

Affiliations recorded on members

An affiliation recorded by a third party, often for one period of a life. It is not the religion of anyone this house ruled.

Connections

How House of Plantagenet connects

Grouped by the kind of relationship, because a successor is not a son and a shared symbol is not an influence.

Family 1

What this means

A documented human family relationship. Not a succession mechanism, and not religious transmission.

Does not imply a religious affiliation held by the whole house · continuous rule

Imported from Wikidata unless a tile says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

Affiliation 4

What this means

Association with a tradition or school. Traditions branch, overlap and re-merge; this is not a clean single-origin tree.

Does not imply a fixed roster · that every account of the tradition knows this figure

Imported from Wikidata unless a tile says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

Succession in office 1

What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Imported from Wikidata unless a tile says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

Transmission 1

What this means

Teaching passed from one person to another. Not biological ancestry and not automatic institutional succession.

Does not imply that the tradition began fully formed · that later adherents accept the attribution

Imported from Wikidata unless a tile says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

Sources

Sources and evidence

Where every statement on this page comes from, and how each one stands.

4 statements on this record

  • 4 Imported Taken from Wikidata as it stands. Nobody here has read it. 4 of them cite only Wikipedia: one source, counted once.

Only this record’s own statements. What other records say about it is counted on theirs.

Three layers, three licences

Data
Wikidata · CC0 1.0
Text
Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted, not merged
Pictures
Wikimedia Commons · each file’s own terms

Review

Not yet read by an editor here. Every relationship on this page is an import.

Disagreements are kept, not resolved, and a count of sources is not a confidence score.

Junta Granada Informa from Granada, España · CC BY-SA 2.0

Keep exploring

More houses, tradition by tradition

The directory lists every one on record, most widely recorded first.

A family on the record
is not a family in a myth.