Skip to content

House

House of Leo

Byzantine dynasty

  • Also called Leonid dynasty, Thracian dynasty

A family
on the record,
reign by reign.

Documented kin

Overview

From Wikipedia, quoted unmodified under CC BY-SA 4.0; the article’s history is its list of authors.

Members · 6

The house, member by member

Oldest first, where a date is recorded.

What this means

People whose own records place them in this house. Membership of a house is a family fact. It is not a religious affiliation and not a right to any office. “Child of” appears where a member’s recorded parent is also in the house — a documented human family, the same kind of claim as membership, and nothing more. Imported from Wikidata: nothing here has been read by an editor.

Succession

Offices held in the house

The members in each office, in order — a selection from the office’s whole line.

Byzantine emperor

  • 8 holders
  • 3 overlaps
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

  1. 7 February 457 CE – 18 January 474 CE Leo I Eastern Roman emperor from 457 to 474
  2. 474 CE – 475 CE Ariadne Byzantine empress as the wife of Zeno and Anastasius I
  3. Overlap held at the same time as Ariadne

    9 February 474 CE – 9 January 475 CE Zeno Byzantine Emperor (425–491)
  4. 18 January 474 CE – 17 November 474 CE Leo II Byzantine emperor (467-474)
  5. 9 January 475 CE – August 476 CE Basiliscus Eastern Roman Emperor from 475 to 476 († 476)
  6. 476 CE – 515 CE Ariadne Byzantine empress as the wife of Zeno and Anastasius I
  7. Overlap held at the same time as Ariadne

    August 476 CE – 9 April 491 CE Zeno Byzantine Emperor (425–491)
  8. Overlap held at the same time as Ariadne

    11 April 491 CE – 9 July 518 CE Anastasius I Byzantine Emperor from 491 to 518

Ancient Roman senator

  • 5 holders
  • 5 undated
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

No dates recorded 5

  • Dates unrecorded Leo I Eastern Roman emperor from 457 to 474
  • Dates unrecorded Anastasius I Byzantine Emperor from 491 to 518
  • Dates unrecorded Zeno Byzantine Emperor (425–491)
  • Dates unrecorded Leo II Byzantine emperor (467-474)
  • Dates unrecorded Basiliscus Eastern Roman Emperor from 475 to 476 († 476)

Roman consul

  • 2 holders
  • 2 undated
What this means

Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.

Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened

Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.

A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.

Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.

Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.

Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

No dates recorded 2

  • Dates unrecorded Zeno Byzantine Emperor (425–491)
  • Dates unrecorded Basiliscus Eastern Roman Emperor from 475 to 476 († 476)

Chronology is not a full explanation

Why one member followed another takes evidence beyond the order of their dates. That both belonged to the house is not, on its own, that evidence.

Religious context · a separate claim

Affiliation

Counted from the members’ own statements — never the religion of anyone the house ruled.

What this means

Assembled from the members’ own statements, and counted. What a person was affiliated with, what a ruler paid for, what a state did and what a population practised are four separate kinds of claim. Only the first two are in the data at all, and they are kept apart here.

Affiliations recorded on members

An affiliation recorded by a third party, often for one period of a life. It is not the religion of anyone this house ruled.

Sources

Sources and evidence

Where every statement on this page comes from, and how each one stands.

0 statements on this record

This record makes no statements of its own yet, so there is nothing here to weigh.

Only this record’s own statements. What other records say about it is counted on theirs.

Three layers, three licences

Data
Wikidata · CC0 1.0
Text
Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted, not merged

Review

Not yet read by an editor here. Every relationship on this page is an import.

Disagreements are kept, not resolved, and a count of sources is not a confidence score.

Junta Granada Informa from Granada, España · CC BY-SA 2.0

Keep exploring

More houses, tradition by tradition

The directory lists every one on record, most widely recorded first.

A family on the record
is not a family in a myth.