A family
on the record,
reign by reign.
Documented kin
Overview
From Wikipedia, quoted unmodified under CC BY-SA 4.0; the article’s history is its list of authors.
Members · 7
The house, member by member
One family drawn as a tree, then every member, oldest first where a date is recorded.
What this means
People whose own records place them in this house. Membership of a house is a family fact. It is not a religious affiliation and not a right to any office. “Child of” appears where a member’s recorded parent is also in the house — a documented human family, the same kind of claim as membership, and nothing more. Imported from Wikidata: nothing here has been read by an editor.
2 children in the house
Every member
People whose own records place them in this house.
-
Heracliusc. 575 CE – 11 February 641 CE · Byzantine emperor from 610 to 641 -
Heraclius Constantine3 May 612 CE – 24 May 641 CE · Child of Heraclius -
Heraklonas618 CE – 641 CE · Child of Heraclius -
Constans II7 November 630 CE – 15 September 668 CE · Child of Heraclius Constantine -
Constantine IV652 CE – 10 July 685 CE · Child of Constans II -
Justinian II669 CE – 11 December 711 CE · Child of Constantine IV -
Tiberius705 CE – December 711 CE · Child of Justinian II
Succession
Offices held in the house
The members in each office, in order — a selection from the office’s whole line.
- 8 holders
- 1 overlap
- 1 gap
- 1 undated
What this means
Who held an office after whom. Not parentage, not discipleship, and not universally recognised — offices are contested.
Does not imply recognition by every tradition · an uncontested claim · parentage · discipleship · an explanation of why the succession happened
Holding an office after someone says nothing about being related to them or taught by them. Where a line is also a family, both are on the holders’ own pages as separate sections.
A gap is a vacancy, an interregnum or a hole in the record; an overlap is rival claims or an office held by more than one at once. The records do not say which, so neither is resolved here. A gap shorter than two years sits inside the precision of year-dated records and is not marked. Only this house’s members are shown, so a gap between two of them may be a holder from outside it.
Why a succession happened is a historical argument. Where sources make one, it belongs in a reviewed connection with its citations — not in this order, and not in a predecessor field.
Recognition is never universal. Where a card names no recognising body, none is recorded — which is not the same as none.
Imported from Wikidata unless a card says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.
-
5 October 610 CE – 11 February 641 CE Heraclius Byzantine emperor from 610 to 641 -
February 641 CE – September 641 CE Heraklonas emperor of Byzantine Empire -
February 641 CE – May 641 CE Heraclius Constantine Byzantine Emperor in 641 -
September 641 CE – 15 September 668 CE Constans II Byzantine Emperor from 641 to 668 -
Overlap held at the same time as Constans II
654 CE – 14 September 685 CE Constantine IV Byzantine emperor from 668 to 685 -
14 September 685 CE – 695 CE Justinian II Byzantine Emperor from 685 to 695 and from 705 to 711 -
Gap about 10 years before the next in this house
705 CE – 11 December 711 CE Justinian II Byzantine Emperor from 685 to 695 and from 705 to 711
No dates recorded 1
-
Dates unrecorded Tiberius 8th century emperor of the Romans
Chronology is not a full explanation
Why one member followed another takes evidence beyond the order of their dates. That both belonged to the house is not, on its own, that evidence.
Religious context · a separate claim
Affiliation
Counted from the members’ own statements — never the religion of anyone the house ruled.
What this means
Assembled from the members’ own statements, and counted. What a person was affiliated with, what a ruler paid for, what a state did and what a population practised are four separate kinds of claim. Only the first two are in the data at all, and they are kept apart here.
Affiliations recorded on members
An affiliation recorded by a third party, often for one period of a life. It is not the religion of anyone this house ruled.
Connections
How Heraclian dynasty connects
Grouped by the kind of relationship, because a successor is not a son and a shared symbol is not an influence.
Affiliation 1
What this means
Association with a tradition or school. Traditions branch, overlap and re-merge; this is not a clean single-origin tree.
Does not imply a fixed roster · that every account of the tradition knows this figure
Imported from Wikidata unless a tile says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.
Sources
Sources and evidence
Where every statement on this page comes from, and how each one stands.
2 statements on this record
- 2 Imported Taken from Wikidata as it stands. Nobody here has read it.
Only this record’s own statements. What other records say about it is counted on theirs.
Three layers, three licences
- Text
- Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted, not merged
Review
Not yet read by an editor here. Every relationship on this page is an import.
Disagreements are kept, not resolved, and a count of sources is not a confidence score.
Keep exploring
More houses, tradition by tradition
The directory lists every one on record, most widely recorded first.
A family on the record
is not a family in a myth.