Skip to content
Acoma  · CC BY 3.0

Figure Christianity

Vladislaus II of Bohemia

Duke and King of Bohemia (1110–1172)

  • Child of Vladislaus I and Richeza of Berg
  • Married to Gertrude of Bohemia, Judith of Thuringia
  • Dated 1110 CE – 18 January 1174 CE

Duke of Bohemia
King of Bohemia
King of Poland

Offices on record

Overview

From Wikipedia, quoted unmodified under CC BY-SA 4.0; the article’s history is its list of authors.

Life

Roles and affiliation

Holding an office is not parentage and not discipleship.

What this means

As the records give them: every row is a third party’s statement, not a self-description, and a role or an affiliation is often held for one period of a life only. An affiliation is not a belief, and this site does not ask anyone about theirs. For an office: which one, for how long, and where the records give an ordinal or the holders either side. Recognition of a tenure is never universal: contested lines appear as overlapping tenures rather than as one corrected sequence.

Offices held 3

  1. 1140 CE – 1158 CE Duke of Bohemia Number 21 in the sequence Succeeded Soběslav I, Duke of Bohemia
  2. 1158 CE – 1172 CE King of Bohemia Number 2 in the sequence Succeeded by Frederick, Duke of Bohemia
  3. Dates unrecorded King of Poland

Family

The family of Vladislaus II of Bohemia

Parents, spouses and children as the records give them.

Documented family only. A teacher, a successor or a patron is never drawn in this tree.

As documented
The family as a list · 15

Family 15

What this means

A documented human family relationship. Not a succession mechanism, and not religious transmission.

Does not imply a right to an office · transmission of a teaching · a religious affiliation held by the whole house · continuous rule · a shared religious affiliation

Imported from Wikidata unless a tile says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.

Religious context

What the records tie them to

Founded, supported, associated with — as third parties recorded it.

What this means

A founding is an attribution, usually contested, and not a claim that the tradition began fully formed. Patronage is an act, not a belief: it says nothing about the religion of a population, and nothing about the patron’s own practice in every period of a life. Domains are as sources record them — for a saint, usually a patronage — rarely exclusive, and not the same in every account.

Sources

Sources and evidence

Where every statement on this page comes from, and how each one stands.

19 statements on this record

  • 6 Has references The statement cites something outside Wikimedia. That citation has not been checked here.
  • 13 Imported Taken from Wikidata as it stands. Nobody here has read it. 2 of them cite only Wikipedia: one source, counted once.

Only this record’s own statements. What other records say about it is counted on theirs.

Three layers, three licences

Data
Wikidata · CC0 1.0
Text
Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted, not merged
Pictures
Wikimedia Commons · each file’s own terms

Review

Not yet read by an editor here. Every relationship on this page is an import.

Disagreements are kept, not resolved, and a count of sources is not a confidence score.

Arild Vågen · CC BY-SA 3.0

Keep exploring

More from Christianity

Its branches, councils, saints, offices and buildings — and where they stopped recognising each other.