Figure
Tancred of Hauteville
Norman petty lord
- Married to Miruel of Hauteville, Fressenda of Hauteville
- Dated 980 CE – 1041 CE
A life on the record,
dated by its sources.
Roles, not beliefs
Overview
From Wikipedia, quoted unmodified under CC BY-SA 4.0; the article’s history is its list of authors.
Family
The family of Tancred of Hauteville
Parents, spouses and children as the records give them.
Documented family only. A teacher, a successor or a patron is never drawn in this tree.
The family as a list · 15
Family 15
What this means
A documented human family relationship. Not a succession mechanism, and not religious transmission.
Does not imply a religious affiliation held by the whole house · continuous rule · a right to an office · transmission of a teaching · a shared religious affiliation
Imported from Wikidata unless a tile says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.
-
of the house Hauteville family noble family - parent of (child) Béatrice de Hauteville Peerage person ID=704180
- parent of (child) Drogo of Hauteville Italian count
- parent of (child) Fredesenda de Hauteville (1030-1097)
- parent of (child) Geoffrey of Hauteville Norman military leader
- parent of (child) Humbert de Hauteville 1025 - 1071
- parent of (child) Humphrey of Hauteville Norman count
- parent of (child) Mauger of Hauteville Italo-Norman noble
- parent of (child) Robert Guiscard Duke of Apulia and Calabria
- parent of (child) Roger I of Sicily Grand Count of Sicily from 1071 to 1101
- parent of (child) Serlo I of Hauteville Norman soldier
- parent of (child) William Iron Arm Norman adventurer, founder of the fortunes of the Hauteville family
- parent of (child) William of the Principate Norman noble
- married to Fressenda of Hauteville second wife of Tancred of Hauteville
- married to Miruel of Hauteville (970 - 1020)
Religious context
What the records tie them to
Founded, supported, associated with — as third parties recorded it.
What this means
A founding is an attribution, usually contested, and not a claim that the tradition began fully formed. Patronage is an act, not a belief: it says nothing about the religion of a population, and nothing about the patron’s own practice in every period of a life. Domains are as sources record them — for a saint, usually a patronage — rarely exclusive, and not the same in every account.
Sources
Sources and evidence
Where every statement on this page comes from, and how each one stands.
15 statements on this record
- 10 Has references The statement cites something outside Wikimedia. That citation has not been checked here.
- 5 Imported Taken from Wikidata as it stands. Nobody here has read it. 1 of them cite only Wikipedia: one source, counted once.
Only this record’s own statements. What other records say about it is counted on theirs.
Three layers, three licences
- Text
- Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted, not merged
- Pictures
- Wikimedia Commons · each file’s own terms
Review
Not yet read by an editor here. Every relationship on this page is an import.
Disagreements are kept, not resolved, and a count of sources is not a confidence score.
Keep exploring
More figures, tradition by tradition
The directory lists every one on record, most widely recorded first.
People on the record,
and people in the telling.