Figure
Princess Maria Antonia Koháry, 2nd Princess of Koháry
Hungarian noblewoman
- Child of Prince Ferenc József Koháry, 1st Prince of Koháry and Maria Antonia of Waldstein-Wartenberg
- Married to Prince Ferdinand of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
- Dated 2 July 1797 CE – 25 September 1862 CE
A life on the record,
dated by its sources.
Roles, not beliefs
Overview
From Wikipedia, quoted unmodified under CC BY-SA 4.0; the article’s history is its list of authors.
Family
The family of Princess Maria Antonia Koháry, 2nd Princess of Koháry
Parents, spouses and children as the records give them.
Documented family only. A teacher, a successor or a patron is never drawn in this tree.
The family as a list · 10
Family 10
What this means
A documented human family relationship. Not a succession mechanism, and not religious transmission.
Does not imply a right to an office · transmission of a teaching · a religious affiliation held by the whole house · continuous rule · a shared religious affiliation
Imported from Wikidata unless a tile says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.
- child of (mother) Maria Antonia of Waldstein-Wartenberg Bohemian noble (1771-1854)
-
child of (child) Prince Ferenc József Koháry, 1st Prince of Koháry Hungarian Chancellor (1767-1826) -
of the house House of Koháry family -
of the house House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha-Koháry Germano-Hungarian Royal Noble Branch of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha - parent of (child) Prince Leopold of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha-Koháry German prince
- parent of (child) Princess Victoria, Duchess of Nemours Saxe-Coburg and Gothan and French Royal
- parent of (child) Ferdinand II of Portugal King of Portugal (1816–1885)
-
parent of (mother) Prince August, 3rd Prince of Koháry German prince (1818–1881) - sibling of Emericus de Kohary Peerage person ID=1811
-
married to Prince Ferdinand of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha German prince (1785-1851)
Religious context
What the records tie them to
Founded, supported, associated with — as third parties recorded it.
What this means
A founding is an attribution, usually contested, and not a claim that the tradition began fully formed. Patronage is an act, not a belief: it says nothing about the religion of a population, and nothing about the patron’s own practice in every period of a life. Domains are as sources record them — for a saint, usually a patronage — rarely exclusive, and not the same in every account.
Sources
Sources and evidence
Where every statement on this page comes from, and how each one stands.
10 statements on this record
- 1 Has references The statement cites something outside Wikimedia. That citation has not been checked here.
- 9 Imported Taken from Wikidata as it stands. Nobody here has read it. 1 of them cite only Wikipedia: one source, counted once.
Only this record’s own statements. What other records say about it is counted on theirs.
Three layers, three licences
- Text
- Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted, not merged
- Pictures
- Wikimedia Commons · each file’s own terms
Review
Not yet read by an editor here. Every relationship on this page is an import.
Disagreements are kept, not resolved, and a count of sources is not a confidence score.
Keep exploring
More figures, tradition by tradition
The directory lists every one on record, most widely recorded first.
People on the record,
and people in the telling.