Figure Christianity
Karl Barth
Carolus Barth la
Swiss Protestant theologian (1886-1968)
- Child of Fritz Barth
- Married to Nelly Barth
- Dated 10 May 1886 CE – 10 December 1968 CE
A life on the record,
dated by its sources.
Roles, not beliefs
Overview
From Wikipedia, quoted unmodified under CC BY-SA 4.0; the article’s history is its list of authors.
Life
Affiliation
As a third party recorded it, often for one period of a life.
What this means
As the records give them: every row is a third party’s statement, not a self-description, and a role or an affiliation is often held for one period of a life only. An affiliation is not a belief, and this site does not ask anyone about theirs. For an office: which one, for how long, and where the records give an ordinal or the holders either side. Recognition of a tenure is never universal: contested lines appear as overlapping tenures rather than as one corrected sequence.
-
Belonged toProtestantism
branch of Christianity that emerged following the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century in opposition to the Roman Catholic Church and rejects papal supremacyHas references - Belonged to
Continental Reformed Protestantism
part of the Calvinist tradition within Protestantism originating in continental EuropeHas references - Belonged to
reformed ↗
reformed or protestant church in SwitzerlandHas references
Family
The family of Karl Barth
Parents, spouses and children as the records give them.
Documented family only. A teacher, a successor or a patron is never drawn in this tree.
The family as a list · 4
Family 4
What this means
A documented human family relationship. Not a succession mechanism, and not religious transmission.
Does not imply a right to an office · transmission of a teaching · a shared religious affiliation
Imported from Wikidata unless a tile says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.
Transmission
Teachers and students
Teaching passed from one person to another, in the direction of the arrows — not ancestry, and not succession.
What this means
In the direction the records give it. This is not biological ancestry and it is not institutional succession: a student who inherited no office still received the teaching, and an heir who received the office may have been taught by someone else entirely. It does not imply that teacher and student agreed.
Connections
How Karl Barth connects
Grouped by the kind of relationship, because a successor is not a son and a shared symbol is not an influence.
Documented influence 9
What this means
A transmission argued from evidence. Not shared symbols, and not a short path through a database.
Does not imply shared symbols as evidence · a short path through a database
Imported from Wikidata unless a tile says otherwise. Nothing here has been read by an editor.
-
was influenced by Adolf von Harnack Baltic German theologian and prominent church historian (1851–1930) -
was influenced by Anselm of Canterbury 11th‑century Benedictine monk, Archbishop of Canterbury, philosopher and theologian -
was influenced by Christoph Blumhardt German theologian (1842-1919) -
was influenced by Friedrich Schleiermacher German theologian, philosopher, and biblical scholar (1768-1834) -
was influenced by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel German philosopher and theologian (1770–1831) -
was influenced by John Calvin French Protestant reformer (1509–1564) -
was influenced by Søren Kierkegaard Danish theologian, philosopher, poet and social critic (1813–1855) -
influenced James H. Cone American theologian (1938–2018) -
influenced Reinhold Niebuhr American Protestant theologian (1892–1971)
Sources
Sources and evidence
Where every statement on this page comes from, and how each one stands.
16 statements on this record
- 10 Has references The statement cites something outside Wikimedia. That citation has not been checked here.
- 6 Imported Taken from Wikidata as it stands. Nobody here has read it. 1 of them cite only Wikipedia: one source, counted once.
Only this record’s own statements. What other records say about it is counted on theirs.
Three layers, three licences
- Text
- Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted, not merged
- Pictures
- Wikimedia Commons · each file’s own terms
Review
Not yet read by an editor here. Every relationship on this page is an import.
Disagreements are kept, not resolved, and a count of sources is not a confidence score.
Keep exploring
More from Christianity
Its branches, councils, saints, offices and buildings — and where they stopped recognising each other.